UK to make all publicly funded research open access

A few months ago the UK government announced that it wanted all UK research that is funded from public money to be available through open access. Now they have told us how they plan to do it. They will pay the journals a fee for each paper they publish.

In the traditional publishing system journals charge people to read a paper, or libraries are charged a fee to hold copies of the journal. In recent years this has moved largely to electronic systems but the principle remains the same. In some cases the authors may pay the journal a fee for their work to be available to everyone for free, but this is the exception rather than the rule.

Now UK researchers will have to use the open access system for all their publications if it is publicly funded. This has to be a good thing because it will make the research more widely available, but how will it alter the dynamics of research?

According to an article in the New Scientist the UK government has set aside 1% of research budgets to pay the open access fees, but the fees are estimated to be £2000 per article. This means that there will be enough to pay for one publication for every £200,000 spent on research. This does not sound like very much, especially in subjects like theoretical physics where many papers are produced by doctorates and post doctorates who dont cost much. Is it enough? Will the money be distributed unevenly with theory departments getting much more of it? Let’s look at it another way. The total amount they have allowed for to pay for the fees is £50 million. At £2000 a paper that is enough to pay for 25,000 papers each year. So how many research papers does the UK produce each year. The answer is at least 100,000 and perhaps several times that. Clearly it does not add up. So how will the system shake out? It will be interesting to see.

9 Responses to UK to make all publicly funded research open access

  1. Andrew Beckwith says:

    I will not mince words. This is a blue print for down sizing UK science, and a sickening move toward official “safe” scientific inquiry that does not rock the boat. The geniuses who came up with this should consider the history of Einstein in the Patent office as well as Josephon, who successfully fought Bardeen to a stand still over flawed science, to know where this is leading to. While the idea of open source is a good thing in itself, this is a move to muzzle and also to radically cut most scientific inquiry in the UK

  2. Andrew Beckwith says:

    I feel for you, Dr. Gibbs. I cannot imagine what this move will do to the free wheeling atmosphere of theoretical barn storming in vogue in Cambridge and Oxford and also Imperial college among other places , and I do not want to know. Needless to say from my vantage point thousands of miles away from this mayhem, I wish you and others luck in stopping this monstrosity. As it is, it is a worrisome retreat from the idea that NOT ALL officially approved science should be seen at the expense of the collective capacity of your nation state

  3. Citation:
    Possibility of changing the frequency of matter waves to a minimum by projecting the total mass as binding energy waves merely by controlling the frequency of oscillation
    Higg’s boson:
    Basically electron may act as particle by relative compression of magneticfield that decreases the wave length forming a particle and the same particle that becomes a wave for randomizing barrier. This may be possible by projecting a similar medium surrounding the space vehicle. Which act like a guide wave. This may be future renormalizing hologram technique using such a system dynamics in optics .
    “If you could manipulate the Higgs field locally, you’d have a great Star Trek device. You could make objects disappear. It’d be a great weapon, a great magic trick — if you could put things back together again,” Krauss told Discovery News.
    Scientists speculate that the Higgs boson might one day allow the “un-massing” of objects or the launching of huge items into space by “switching off” or changing the subatomic particle. Spin frequency converting all the mass into binding energy waves and freeze it again.
    Sankara Velayudhan Nandakumar retired Chief Engineer member PNAS ,American ,JILA,NIST ,Hubble Group member on behalf of Loyola college of Engineering and technology ,Member American committee for the Weizman institute of science ,Energy renovation committee cape Institute of Technology,Nagercoil ,former Guest lecturer ,KNSK Engineering college ,Anna University Now Assistant professor MET Engineering college has surprisingly found out genetic mirror
    There is always pilot wave operated matter waves also play the role-reg [Incident: 120718-000056 news@nature.com
    hubblesite.org support: ISSUE=3515 PROJ=13
    efiadmin@lists.uchicago.edu
    blucher@hep.uchicago.edu

    • Philip Gibbs says:

      The big question is what will happen when the theorists are told they have used up their publication budget for the year after one month. They may protest and the system will collapse, or they may just publish on arXiv, or they may get together and form their own open access journals with free submissions

      • Dilaton says:

        Ah, maybe THAT is the hidden intention behind this monstrosity: to make research in the UK collapse in order to obtain an excuse to cancel (large parts of) it …

        I wish the researchers in the UK all the best for successfully fighting this threat or find otherwise an appropriate solution that works !

  4. Nigel Cook says:

    Robert Maxwell made his Pergamon Press fortune with high page charges for a large number of scientific journals, which in many cases limited submissions to government funded research institutes which could afford to pay the charges out of research grants. Journals like Nature (with good advertising revenue) did not invoice authors page charges, but as a result they were highly competitive, with a large number of rejections.

    However, journals originated as individual’s printing presses, to which other people who did not have printing presses could submit papers. They are an anachronism today, except as fashionable marketing tools, allowing the science citation index to work as a popularity meter, which turns science into a profitable media circus.

  5. […] 2012/07/17: viXra: UK to make all freely funded investigate open accessA few months ago the UK regime announced that it wanted all UK investigate that is funded from public money to be void owing to open access. Now they have told us how they plot to do it. They will pay the journals a fee for each paper they circulate. […]

  6. Mitchell Porter says:

    vixra is being flooded with papers on computing and engineering this weekend.

    • Philip Gibbs says:

      They are papers from the International Journal of Mechanical Engineering submitted by the editor. Any journals are welcome to archive their papers here provided they split them into individual papers

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 281 other followers

%d bloggers like this: